Monday, December 23, 2013

Need for a constructive reservation policy for a better civil services examination


THESE ARE COMPLETELY MY PERSONAL VIEWS.


It all started with the bitter seeds sown by “minto-morley “reforms of 1909, when a separate electorate was given to Muslims for the first time. Where by only Muslims can be elected as representative for Muslim population. Later this was extended to Christians, Sikhs, and other minority groups in 1919 through Montague-chelmsford reforms. This is to divide the well knitted communities and rule them when in chaos. Mahatma Gandhi categorically criticized this and against such community based representation. He went on hunger strike and past unto death at yerravada jail in pune .Mahatma knows what disaster lies ahead with such community based representation.

Dr.B.R.Ambedkar who later on became the father of our Indian constitution had favored such discrimination based on community basis and supported the separated electorate for different communities. Where by now Sikhs can elected only Sikhs, Christians only Christians and Muslims among Muslims. But the hunger strike by Gandhiji made Ambedkar to realize the disaster ahead. As a compromise, he seek certain “quota” are to be reserved for the minorities and down trodden in the legislatures. This is a giant leap towards downtrodden communities’ people, where by now their aspirations are also considered in the nation making. This agreement between Gandhi and Ambedkar is famously termed as the “pune pact”.
When India became independent in 1947 Aug. 15, the responsibility of constitution making was given to the drafting committee headed by Dr.B.R.Ambedkar. This time the reservations became more explicit by providing provisions in the constitution .DRAmbedkar urged for the time bound implementation and to dilute thereafter .But our political class is eating grass to get into power, so it’s extending the reservation there by every 10 years. Recently in 2010 the government of the day extended the reservation for 10 more years.is it a shame on the government? Even after 65 so called glorious years of independence there are still reservations. Why still so many downtrodden existed? And Year after year their count should be decreased but why every year, new  and many more people are coming under the umbrella of reservations? What is the pride for government in granting to every community the tag of reservation? How long they are going to continue this menace? Is the reservation policy followed by the India government is rational? Is it justifiable?
The intention behind bringing the reservation policy is to give the down trodden sections a window of hope. How is it being used? As a weapon to destroy the societal maladies? Or as a tool to build the egalitarian neo Indian society. Or is it used to destroy the nation and ruin the system?
It is agreed fact that before pre independence and there after till the 1970’s to 80’s there is a wide spread discrimination against certain classes of the society. But today these natural differences are reduced to wafer thin thickness if not to zero. But the political parties are creating artificial differences in the society in the name of SC/ST/BC’S/OBC’S etc… absolutely for vote’s by doing so they successfully reducing the peace in the society to wafer thin thickness. On one hand we are boasting as a Secular Nation then why should the Government encourage caste or community groupings and caste factionalism and caste backed leaders and caste politics?
The intention and concept of reservation is misguided, misused. Today this issue of reservation appears to be a chronic problem in the society. Affecting the nation’s progress in all the directions.
Why the government is NOT projecting the past and future expected trends in the no of people benefited from the reservation policy over the past 65 years. Does the government have a fair, transparent, justifiable reservation policy? Why every time government is adding more castes and communities into the reservation fold? It should be the other way, government day by day should reduce the no of people from reservation benefit list. Doesn’t the government feel ashamed to say that still no progress in the life’s of peoples of downtrodden sections of society? Are the people becoming backward or the government regressing for vote bank politics? Does any politician in India have guts to say that he is ready to revive and modify the reservation policy? Nutrition, malnutrition, Infant Mortality rate, maternal mortality rate, illiteracy, ignorance, unemployment, growing crime against child and women whatever may the index India is faring poorly, why? For how long you want to see India as a developing nation? As a poor nation? Why can’t we improve our Human development Index [HDI]? Why our nation progress which can’t has ample man and material resources at its door steps.

Growing Merit deficit offices:
THE only aim government is to somehow or other bring the reserved category of people to government posts. There by posing to people as a well-wisher of these peoples. The government is least bothered about their merit, whether they fit into the position or not. This is particularly seen in case of countries highly respectable positions like IFS, IAS,IPS ...etc. who are recruited by an uncompetitive and unjustifiable policy through UPSC. There is a clear discrimination, where many eligible and meritorious general category candidates are eliminated, and the positions are filled by some merit deficit people there by bringing the nations governance to chaos. Why India is where it is since independence? Is absolutely due to the irrational Reservation policy.
Look down the kind of discrimination the General candidates are faced in the exam.

GENERAL
SC/ST
BC
ATTEMPTS
4
unlimited
7
Upper AGE limit
30
35
33
RESERVATION IN PRILIMINARY
NA
yes
yes
RES. IN MAIN EXAMS
NA
yes
yes
INTERVIEW
NA
NA
NA
Main exams cutoff
HIGH [relatively]
More than 50 marks less than genral people
Around 20 markes less than genral people
Total score to get a service
high
Very less [relatively]
Less[relatively]

THIS comparison is to give a view of discrimination made in the name of reservation. This is why brain drain is happening. What about the hopes, aspirations, dreams of general category people? Is this called equitable justice?

 See clear cut discrimination in case of preliminary and Main Examinations
Cutoffs for UPSC CSAT-2012 Preliminary Exam
Category    Preliminary Exam (CSAT2012)      Final (Mains+ interview)
General                 209                                                            936
OBC                    190                                                              911
SC                        185                                                              870
ST                        181                                                              864
PH-1                    160                                                              858
PH-2                    164                                                              942
PH-3                    111                                                              802


The reservation policy can be pro downtrodden people but can’t be against the general candidates. From the above marks list you can see who is most eligible.
What is the difference between 530 and 688?


What changes can be made to have a fair and justifiable reservation policy?
I have following points which makes the reservation policy more equitable, in civil services
1. Give unlimited attempts without compromising on the cutoff marks for reserved category people.
2. Give only 4 attempts to every aspirant irrespective of the category he/she belongs to, while compromising on the cutoff marks is allowed
3. Give more NO.OF attempts to general category aspirants and also increase the upper age limit for them, for after all being born in general category is not their crime.
4. Most importantly government should aim at building the skills and enhancing the potency of reserved category people. By reducing the cutoff marks, government is accepting the inability of those people indirectly. Government should strive to enhance their skills i.e.  It should enable them to catch the fish not to feed them. Why should someone hire an inefficient person? Instead make them efficient and then hire.
5. Government is already training them for free of cost, let it do more effectively. Let the government train them in best institutions of their choice. And then begin the race, whoever comes first let them take the cup. Don’t compromise on cutoff marks. Let it be same for everyone. Doing this the Government can increase their efficiency.
6. Not only in civil services but in any competitive exam let the government hire on the basis of merit. The reason for which private sector keeps growing and government sector perishing is the blind and non-fair, and non-transparent reservation policy.
7. Remove the concept of carry forward, let the eligible in General category people occupy when the seats are not filled. Why such a big injustice


If this irrational reservation policy goes unbridled, then there may rise strong anti-reservation opposition and parties that support them, which in turn may threaten the entire concept of positive discrimination.
You can’t hire an amputee as a driver to your car, but how can you do this when you’re choosing for the drivers of economy and society and the nation as a whole. This may lead to two things, either such a driver will cause accidents and create havoc to others too or the car stays where there it is, i.e. without progress. Now you can think of the progress made by India. Can you see anything?
Why brain drain is happening? The Nobel laureate shri venkata raman rama Krishnan is an example for this. If India provided for the encouragement of real merit, today he might be called as an absolute citizen of India. But we have no shame in calling him Indian origin when he’s legally no longer an Indian citizen. This is one of the example for how people are shining when they went out of India, where only merit is considered. Politicians are literally dividing the society in to SC/ST/BC/ and OC absolutely for their political gains. When these divisions shall goes off.
What about the meritorious poor general candidates? Where should they go when they are unable to fulfill their desire either a job in government sector or a seat in medicine or engineering. Take the case of Gayatri and others (V) government of Tamilnadu, this case explains the pathetic situation in which the general candidates are placed.
Young Gayatri a 12th class student scored 98.5% of marks, yet she was denied admission in any of the medical colleges in Tamilnadu. She’s denied absolutely because of the present 69% reservation in Tamilnadu. Why is the Supreme Court and the high court of Tamilnadu are blind to wards this. Doesn’t the Tamilnadu know that 50% is the upper limit for any reservations? Where shall the most eligible candidates go? Is this not a reason why in India the medical service is of substandard especially in government hospitals? Does any politician dare to get a treatment in the government hospitals that are flooded with the so called people of their choice? Why should they go aboard for any misalignment? Why can’t they treated in India? Why should the people suffer in the hands of impotent and inefficient medical staff?
In the above case of gayatri and others v Tamilnadu government, there are around 15 students in between 98% to 98.5 % marks who were denied admission. Thanks to the Supreme Court, which intervened and asked the state to create seats for these people. What about the other people who have no access to any legal service? Yet highly meritorious? What he/she commits a suicide? What if he/she turns as an extremist? If the government’s is really interested let them create a separate state for all the reserved people and put all our income there for their development but should not play with our career, dreams and aspirations.
India remains a backward and poor developing nation if these idiotic policies were continued irrationally. When there is no recognition for merit the brains will drain into an ocean where they are considered.
How the policy should be:
Having said the draw backs with various case studies, now I have a view towards a constructive reservation policy particularly to be followed in civil services examination, for a better India and a better world.
One should be clear to reader is I’m not against any reservation policy. But I’m against only for an irrational policy which deteriorates the system of governance and economy and the entire national dignity in the world as a whole.
Let us consider the following views for a comprehensive and constructive reservation policy.
1. Capacity building:
The policy should aim at building the capacity of reserved category candidates so that they can compete with general merit candidates without any embarrassed feeling .This ensures a moderate cut off for all people and true merit is recognized. Thus reduces the feeling among general merit people that the reserved candidates are of general merit.
How capacity building could be done then? [For competitive exams civil services in particular]:
The government already has necessary institutions like the SC study circle, ST study circle, BC study circle; it should now concentrate on physical and social infrastructure. Give the down trodden people good schooling {though the RTE is there but its performance is not up to the mark.}Ask them to join any school of their wish in their area or far off, let the government pays for their dues. It doesn’t cost much when compared to unfruitful projects and mismanaged funds and corruption taking place in the system. Let a separate school funding department be established, collect funds by donations from big corporate to ordinary people. Let the CSR be directed towards such fruit full things. Provide those people with best food, accommodation; enable them to compete in general category. Remove the segregation of people in to 4 class fold of SC/ST/OBC/OC choose the ones who comes first in the race, otherwise the reservations have made the entrances a gambling. Whereas the General merit people are shelling more money out of their pockets to the educational institutions business. This is irony to say that, today education business has become worse than prostitution. Degrees are sold in open market. Recognize the merit; to prevent brain drain. What is the use in making an unfit candidate getting admitted into top most institutions without any merit and wasting his career? And also, the career of the most potent candidates, who were being eliminated in the race due to undeserved candidates, occupied the positions.
Reaching for roots
Remove all different categories in all application forms. Help the poor and needy on whatever caste/religion they may be. For this have a comprehensive survey at root level i.e., gram panchayats List out - Lock - Levy - Let them live. I.e. list out the true beneficiaries, lock the list and then levy a tax for their wellbeing and let them live.
Duplicity
Weed out the duplicate/Ghost users. False People, who acquire the reserved certificates using illegal means.
One Person Norm
Let the reservation be used by one person while appearing for a topmost job using the quotes (IAS, IPS) make him as OC immediately. Why should his siblings, sons/daughters use SC/ST/BC quota even after he made into any Government JOB? Let others too benefit.
One Time use
Policy should be made in such a way that the person who’s in reservation quote shall use the reservation either in education or during the job why all his life?
Creamy Layer
Government should fix the creamy layer rationally. For any person SC/ST/BC it can be around 4 lakhs/annum , Below this give them financial support, it can’t be as high as 6 lakhs as the Government decided recently this is absolutely vote bank politics because more no of people will fit  under this umbrella  and parties can increase their vote share.
No Compromise on merit, No reservation in promotions.
Whatever may be the case an entrance test for admission to a professional course or a competitive exam to Government Jobs everyone should have equal cutoff, only merit should be considered under any circumstances, else India will be India for ever like this with inefficient people in offices. Red Tapism, delay etc.
 RESERVATION IN PROMOTION promotes the laziness, now why the candidates works any way he will be promoted, when there is reservation, why he/she should listen to his superior it disturbs the harmony in offices.
Government can correct its mistake by implementing at least few of the suggestions made for a better India. It is the responsibility of government to see all sections of society benefit. Not only a few at the cost of others. By having a fair, transparent, time bound, comprehensive and constructive policy on reservation we can see a better India for a better world very soon.
JAI HINDH



No comments:

Post a Comment